On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:14 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > ... Another advantage of master-only is a guarantee against
> > disrupting time-critical patches. (It would be ugly to push back branches and
> > sort out the master push later, but it doesn't obstruct the mission.)
>
> Hm, doesn't it? I had the idea that "git push" is atomic --- either all
> the per-branch commits succeed, or they all fail. I might be wrong.
As of Git 2.28, atomic pushes are not turned on by default. That means
"git push my-remote foo bar" _can_ result in partial success. I'm that
paranoid who does "git push --atomic my-remote foo bar fizz".
Cheers,
Jesse
