Re: Bad Query Plans on 10.3 vs 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Cory Tucker
Subject Re: Bad Query Plans on 10.3 vs 9.6
Date
Msg-id CAG_=8kAky_Fh3zsBuVHeaS-21QtCqdN8PKBVMrNcO2znjgq50g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad Query Plans on 10.3 vs 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bad Query Plans on 10.3 vs 9.6  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
Another possibility is that 10.3 sees the index-only scan as too expensive
because it thinks most of the table isn't all-visible.  Comparing
pg_class.relallvisible values might be informative.

                        regards, tom lane

I'm happy to try to dig into this one more, however, I'm not familiar with this value.  What should I be looking for here? 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad Query Plans on 10.3 vs 9.6
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad Query Plans on 10.3 vs 9.6