Query Crashes PG 10.3 using partitions, works on 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Cory Tucker
Subject Query Crashes PG 10.3 using partitions, works on 9.6
Date
Msg-id CAG_=8kAYKjhQX3FmAWQBC95Evh3+qszOQxkNMm1Q4W1QO7+c4Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses RE: Query Crashes PG 10.3 using partitions, works on 9.6  ("Kumar, Virendra" <Virendra.Kumar@guycarp.com>)
Re: Query Crashes PG 10.3 using partitions, works on 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Hey guys, I am in the middle of testing out a database migration from 9.6 to 10.3.  We have a quasi-multi tenant based application and so are utilizing native partitions on some relations to help improve some performance.

I was issuing a query on both databases to cleanup some duplicates in preparation of applying new indexes.  On the 9.6 database with all the data in one table, the query runs fine in about 6 min.  On 10.3, with a work_mem setting of 1GB the query runs for about 7 minutes and then gets terminated with an out of memory error.  If I bump the work_mem up fairly high (12GB out of 52GB available) the server actually crashes.

On the both databases, the total dataset size is exactly the same, ~29M records.  The table looks like this:

                      Table "candidate_person"
    Column    |           Type           | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------------+--------------------------+-----------+----------+---------
 created_at   | timestamp with time zone |           | not null | now()
 modified_at  | timestamp with time zone |           | not null | now()
 account_id   | bigint                   |           | not null |
 candidate_id | character varying(40)    | C         | not null |
 first_name   | text                     |           |          |
 middle_name  | text                     |           |          |
 last_name    | text                     |           |          |
 spouse       | boolean                  |           | not null | false
 suffix       | text                     |           |          |
 salutation   | text                     |           |          |
Partition key: LIST (account_id)

With the only difference being on 9.6 there obviously isn't any partitions.  On 10.3 there are ~250 partition tables.

I have attached the server log that shows the first out of memory and then the server crash and recovery.
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvar Freude
Date:
Subject: Question about buffers_alloc in pg_stat_bgwriter view for monitoring
Next
From: "Kumar, Virendra"
Date:
Subject: RE: Query Crashes PG 10.3 using partitions, works on 9.6