On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Robert Klemme
<shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, my fault was to assume you wanted to measure only your part, while
> apparently you meant overall savings. But Tom had asked for separate
> measurements if I understood him correctly. Also, that measurement of
> your change would go after the O(N^2) fix. It could actually turn out
> to be much more than 9% because the overall time would be reduced even
> more dramatic. So it might actually be good for your fix to wait a
> bit. ;-)
It's not clear whether Tom is already working on that O(N^2) fix in locking.
I'm asking because it doesn't seem like a complicated patch,
contributors may want to get working if not ;-)
