On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On 25 July 2014 20:47, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Another idea would be to
>
>> ...persist the optimal dump order in the database.
>
>> That way we can maintain the correct dump order each time we do DDL,
>> which is only a small incremental cost, no matter how many objects we
>> have.
>
> I don't see any obvious way to make it incremental; so I doubt that
> it would be a small extra cost. In any case I disagree that making DDL
> slower to make pg_dump faster is a good tradeoff. Many people seldom
> or never use pg_dump.
>
> regards, tom lane
Not to mention slowing down temp tables
