Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpYWmVw=MDvJJvK9dm42dg8HU3XO=TS1+EhyUSTQMwbwYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova
> <lubennikovaav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
>> make installcheck-world:  tested, failed
>> Implements feature:       not tested
>> Spec compliant:           not tested
>> Documentation:            not tested
>>
>> Hi,
>> I haven't read through the thread yet, just tried to apply the patch and run tests.
>> And it seems that the last attached version is outdated now. It doesn't apply to the master
>> and after I've tried to fix merge conflict, it segfaults at initdb.
>
>
> I'll rebase when I get some time to do it and post an updated version

Attached rebased patches. I called them both v3 to be consistent.

I'm not sure how you ran it, but this works fine for me:

./configure --enable-debug --enable-cassert
make clean
make check

... after a while ...

=======================
 All 168 tests passed.
=======================

I reckon the above is equivalent to installcheck, but doesn't require
sudo or actually installing the server, so installcheck should work
assuming the install went ok.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Read/write expanded objects versus domains and CASE