On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:44 PM, johnlumby <johnlumby@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I'll try to do some measuring of performance with:
> a) git head
> b) git head + patch as-is
> c) git head + patch without aio_suspend in foreign processes (just re-read)
> d) git head + patch with a lwlock (or whatever works) instead of aio_suspend
>
> a-c will be the fastest, d might take some while.
>
> I'll let you know of the results as I get them.
>
>
> Claudio, I am not quite sure if what I am submitting now is
> quite the same as any of yours. As I promised before, but have
> not yet done, I will package one or two of my benchmarks and
> send them in.
It's a tad different. c will not do polling on the foreign process, I
will just let PG do the read again. d will be like polling, but
without the associated CPU overhead.
