On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I haven't touched the randomAccess part yet. My initial goal was > to incorporate the BufFileSet api's here.
This is going to need a rebase, due to the commit today to remove replacement selection sort. That much should be easy.
Sorry for delay, here is rebase version of patch.
> Sorry, I didn't get this part. Are you talking about the your patch changes > into OpenTemporaryFileInTablespace(), BufFileUnify() and other changes > related to ltsUnify() ? If that's the case, I don't think it require with > the > BufFileSet. Correct me if I am wrong here.
I thought that you'd have multiple BufFiles, which would be multiplexed (much like a single BufFile itself mutiplexes 1GB segments), so that logtape.c could still recycle space in the randomAccess case. I guess that that's not a goal now.
Hmm okay.
> To be frank its too early for me to comment anything in this area. I need > to study this more closely. As an initial goal I was just focused on > understanding the current implementation of the patch and incorporate > the BufFileSet APIs.
