On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Can we actually call it max_parallel_maintenance_workers instead? >> I mean we don't have work_mem_maintenance. > > Good point.
WFM.
This is good point. I agree with max_parallel_maintenance_workers.