Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rushabh Lathia
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Date
Msg-id CAGPqQf1rJvnXE8tvbbrgfrCOF1hP0QuJfyrOprQUCrXX4KBHVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can we actually call it max_parallel_maintenance_workers instead?
>> I mean we don't have work_mem_maintenance.
>
> Good point.

WFM.


This is good point. I agree with max_parallel_maintenance_workers. 
 
--
Peter Geoghegan



--
Rushabh Lathia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table