Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Ford
Subject Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions
Date
Msg-id CAGMVOdvrZCwJg0BngM9GMO+LK=j20vhSfdk1gTTBNNH311Vgsw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions  (Oliver Ford <ojford@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the WindowFunctions  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Oliver Ford <ojford@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Erikjan Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>   SELECT pg_get_viewdef('v_window');
>> !                 pg_get_viewdef
>> ! ----------------------------------------------
>> !   SELECT i.i,                                +
>> !      sum(i.i) OVER (ORDER BY i.i) AS sum_rows+
>>       FROM generate_series(1, 10) i(i);
>>   (1 row)
>>
>> --- 1034,1043 ----
>>   (10 rows)
>>
>>   SELECT pg_get_viewdef('v_window');
>> !                                     pg_get_viewdef
>> !
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> !   SELECT i.i,
>> +
>> !      sum(i.i) OVER (ORDER BY i.i ROWS BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING)
>> AS sum_rows+
>>       FROM generate_series(1, 10) i(i);
>>   (1 row)
>>
>>
>> This small hickup didn't prevent building an instance but obviously I
>> haven't done any real tests yet.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>
>> Erik Rijkers
>
> After another clone and rebuild it works alright with the correct
> spacing on mine, so the attached v2 should all pass. I noticed that I
> hadn't added the exclusions clauses to the view defs code, so that's
> also in this patch with extra tests to cover it.

Sorry previous patch was in full-commit form and not just a diff.
Attached is it in bare diff form.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp