Re: Add Pipelining support in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Add Pipelining support in psql
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQTiCvOxxuA98Ei+qVb1px82eP-iRvJvnvrcKU1de55-Pw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add Pipelining support in psql  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 07:43, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Hmm.  The start, end and sync meta-commands are useful for testing.  I
> find the flush control a bit less interesting, TBH.
>
> What would you use these for?

I guess mostly for interactively playing around with pipelining from psql.

But I think \getresult would be useful for testing too. This would
allow us to test that we can read part of the pipeline, without
sending a sync and waiting for everything.

To be clear \flushrequest and \flush would be necessary to make
\getresult work reliably.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: UUID v7
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation