The rebase was indeed trivial (git handled everything automatically),
because my first patch was doing a superset of the changes that were
committed in b6dfee28f. Attached are the new patches.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 19:04, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 13:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com> writes:
> > > It looks like this needs a big rebase in fea-uth.c fe-auth-scram.c and
> > > fe-connect.c. Every hunk is failing which perhaps means the code
> > > you're patching has been moved or refactored?
> >
> > The cfbot is giving up after
> > v14-0001-libpq-Run-pgindent-after-a9e9a9f32b3.patch fails,
> > but that's been superseded (at least in part) by b6dfee28f.
>
> Ah, same with Jelte Fennema's patch for load balancing in libpq.
>
> --
> greg
