shared_buffers formula - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alexander Shutyaev
Subject shared_buffers formula
Date
Msg-id CAGBp8g_W-y2T_1osM2cyO=2XzL96hQe2Ccq3tiR69a6tkeGLbg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: shared_buffers formula
List pgsql-general
Hello all!

Recently we've been having problems with swap on our postgresql server. It has 125GB of RAM. We've decided to calculate it's memory consumption. To do this we've used the formulas from the official docs [1]. However there is one parameter that seems strange - Shared disk buffers. According to the formula it occupies the following space:

(block_size + 208) * shared_buffers

Our values are

block_size=8192
shared_buffers=30GB

The block_size has the default value and shared_buffers was calculated by pgtune. According to the formula the product will be around 252 000 GB which doesn't make any sense. Is there something wrong with the formula? Or should we make our shared_buffers approx. 10 000 times lower? :)

Thanks in advance,
Alexander Shutyaev

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html#SHARED-MEMORY-PARAMETERS

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Novák, Petr
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Data corruption after restarting replica
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: shared_buffers formula