Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Brindle
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
Date
Msg-id CAGB+Vh4Om+DFD2KChk5bjz+F2c+AJWDdPqiKPNxf5Ld3CvwwFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:45 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/8/21, 2:19 PM, "Joshua Brindle" <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the review, attached is an update with that comment fixed
> > and also sgml documentation changes that I missed earlier.
>
> I think there are a number of documentation changes that are still
> missing.  I did a quick scan and saw the "is member of" language in
> func.sgml, monitoring.sgml, pgbuffercache.sgml, pgfreespacemap.sgml,
> pgrowlocks.sgml, pgstatstatements.sgml, and pgvisibility.sgml.

All of these and also adminpack.sgml updated. I think that is all of
them but docs broken across lines and irregular wording makes it
difficult.

> <para>
>  By default, the <structname>pg_shmem_allocations</structname> view can be
> -   read only by superusers or members of the <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal>
> -   role.
> +   read only by superusers or roles with privilges of the
> +   <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal> role.
> </para>
> </sect1>
>
> nitpick: "privileges" is misspelled.

Fixed, thanks for reviewing.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: ALTER TABLE DETACH PARTITION violates serializability
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is heap_page_prune() stats collector accounting wrong?