Re: PATCH: pgagent connection string parsing - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Ashesh Vashi
Subject Re: PATCH: pgagent connection string parsing
Date
Msg-id CAG7mmoxuE8hB0g3-G-5++YyHkz0DkB+14J1g-715-N6zCN4r7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: pgagent connection string parsing  (Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
[Adding pgadmin-hackers list...]

Hi Team,

Using the mutex around the logging code too to avoid overlapping log message.
Please review it, and let me know your concern.

Implementation details:
- Moved 'MutexLogger' class, which was used by the connection management code only, in the include/misc.h
-  Use a static mutex for the non-windows system, and used 'MutexLogger' instance for the better lock/unlock mechanism in the LogMessage(...) function.
Hi Team,

Please review this patch.

-- Thanks, Ashesh 

-- Thanks, Ashesh


On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:


On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Krennwallner <tk+pgsql@postsubmeta.net> wrote:
Hi,

I've just found this suspicious log messages (I've added line numbers in
the attachment pgagent.log):

 8  Tue May 8 11:11:23 2018 DEBUG: Creating DB connection: service=xiserver56_tisdbadm cTue May o8nne ct_timeout11:=151: 23 201 8applica DEBtUion_nameG: S=pglaeegpeinngt.@.d.e
 9  v_tisdevel dbname=dev_tisdevel

Note how line 8 and 9 are actually two log messages, which should
have been printed in two lines:

Tue May 8 11:11:23 2018 DEBUG: Creating DB connection: service=xiserver56_tisdbadm connect_timeout=5  application_name=pgagent@dev_tisdevel dbname=dev_tisdevel
Tue May 8 11:11:23 2018 DEBUG: Sleeping...

It appears that two threads are writing to stdout at the same time,
which calls for an exclusive lock in function
void LogMessage(const std::wstring &msg, const int &level)
Dave,

Shall we use a mutex here too?


I would think so, yes.  

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aditya Toshniwal
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][RM3294] User need to reset the layout to see thechanged preferences parameters
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: pgAdmin 4 commit: Correct the runtime options list.