--
Thanks & Regards,Ashesh VashiEnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi
Hi,PFA patch for user management functionality.Major changes in this patch are:1. In-place editing of user and saving on server.2. Removed dependency on marshmallow python package.3. UI improvements.4. Search by email.-- Harshal DhumalSoftware EngineerEnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.comThe Enterprise PostgreSQL CompanyOn Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;- Why do we need Marshmallow?- Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.Hmm.. He just added one more role - 'Standard'.'Administrator' role was already presents in it.Oh yes, sorry, misread that. 'pgAdmin User Role' would be a better description though I think. Yeah - that can be done. :-)--Thanks & Regards,Ashesh VashiEnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Companyhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi -- Dave PageBlog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.comTwitter: @pgsnakeEnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.comThe Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;- Why do we need Marshmallow?- Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.Hmm.. He just added one more role - 'Standard'.'Administrator' role was already presents in it.Oh yes, sorry, misread that. 'pgAdmin User Role' would be a better description though I think. Yeah - that can be done. :-)--Thanks & Regards,Ashesh VashiEnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Companyhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi -- Dave PageBlog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.comTwitter: @pgsnakeEnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.comThe Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;- Why do we need Marshmallow?- Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.Hmm.. He just added one more role - 'Standard'.'Administrator' role was already presents in it.Oh yes, sorry, misread that. 'pgAdmin User Role' would be a better description though I think.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;- Why do we need Marshmallow?- Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.Hmm.. He just added one more role - 'Standard'.'Administrator' role was already presents in it.
Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;- Why do we need Marshmallow?- Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.
-- Dave PageBlog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.comTwitter: @pgsnakeEnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.comThe Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgadmin-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных