Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Nicolas Grilly
Subject Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application?
Date
Msg-id CAG3yVS5zM97YdwMK5y7NU-vYATnrx89DAQg5kR=sPzV1CmRTog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application?  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application?  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> wrote:
We have been using the extension pg_repack to keep a table groomed into
cluster order. With an appropriate FILLFACTOR to keep updates on the same
page, it works well. The issue is that it needs space to rebuild the new
index/table. If you have that, it works well.

It looks like Instagram has been using pg_reorg (the ancestor of pg_repack) to keep all likes from the same user contiguous on disk, in order to minimize disk seeks.


This is very similar to what I'm trying to achieve.

The article is 3 years old. I'd be curious to know if they still do that.

Nicolas

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Kenneth Marshall
Date:
Subject: Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application?
Next
From: Ben Chobot
Date:
Subject: Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application?