Re: Proposal: Progressive explain - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rafael Thofehrn Castro
Subject Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
Date
Msg-id CAG0ozMo2HQjmpn9AHGXOo726-PgH=+XmkoPUVxAqvcOS6puq8g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Progressive explain  (Rafael Thofehrn Castro <rafaelthca@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
List pgsql-hackers
> That is correct. Interval currently is only used when instrumentation
> is enabled through progressive_explain = analyze.

I guess there would still be a point in printing the plan on a regular interval
when instrumentation is disabled. In that case the only thing we would see
changing in the plan is the node currently being executed. But with that we
add more overhead to progressive_explain = 'explain', that in that case will
also require a custom execProcNode wrapper.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rafael Thofehrn Castro
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree