Re: DDL issue - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tony Shelver
Subject Re: DDL issue
Date
Msg-id CAG0dhZDFYNzCSvAgs3rTmnarXJrR38SLMRb96kq_0k+zam9ZjA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DDL issue  (Muhammad Usman Khan <usman.k@bitnine.net>)
Responses Re: DDL issue
List pgsql-general

On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 06:43, Muhammad Usman Khan <usman.k@bitnine.net> wrote:
Hi,
To handle this situation in PostgreSQL, you can model the data in a way that maintains a single entry for each owner in the people table while linking the owner to multiple dairies through a separate dairies table. This is a typical one-to-many relationship (one person can own many dairies).
The following is testing scenario which might help you

-- Create people table (one entry per person) 
CREATE TABLE people ( person_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, 
first_name VARCHAR(100), 
last_name VARCHAR(100), 
email VARCHAR(100) UNIQUE ); 

-- Create dairies table (each dairy will be linked to a person) 
CREATE TABLE dairies ( dairy_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, 
dairy_name VARCHAR(100), 
location VARCHAR(100), 
phone_number VARCHAR(15), 
person_id INT REFERENCES people(person_id) ON DELETE CASCADE ); 

-- Insert a person (owner) into people table 
INSERT INTO people (first_name, last_name, email) VALUES ('usman', 'khan', 'usmankhan@example.com'); 
-- Insert multiple dairies owned by the same person 
INSERT INTO dairies (dairy_name, location, phone_number, person_id) VALUES ('Dairy A', 'Location A', '123456789', 1), ('Dairy B', 'Location B', '987654321', 1), ('Dairy C', 'Location C', '111222333', 1), ('Dairy D', 'Location D', '444555666', 1), ('Dairy E', 'Location E', '777888999', 1);  

SELECT p.first_name, p.last_name, p.email, d.dairy_name, d.location, d.phone_number
FROM people p
JOIN dairies d ON p.person_id = d.person_id
WHERE p.email = 'usmankhan@example.com';

Output:

first_name | last_name | email               | dairy_name | location   | phone_number
----------- |----------- |--------------------- |------------|------------|--------------
usman       | khan       | usmankhan@example.com | Dairy A    | Location A | 123456789
usman       | khan       | usmankhan@example.com | Dairy B    | Location B | 987654321
usman       | khan       | usmankhan@example.com | Dairy C    | Location C | 111222333
usman       | khan       | usmankhan@example.com | Dairy D    | Location D | 444555666
usman       | khan       | usmankhan@example.com | Dairy E    | Location E | 777888999

On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 04:01, Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com> wrote:
I have one name in the people table who owns 5 different dairies with three
different phone numbers, but all 5 have the the same email address.

The five dairies each has its own name and location while the people table
has five rows with the same last and first names and email address.

Is there a way to have only one entry for the owner in the people table
while related to five different company names? In some industries, such as
dairy farms, this is not an unusual situation.

TIA,

Rich




Or if you want to get even more flexible, where a dairy could have more than one owner as well as one owner having more than one dairy, you could create an intersection / relationship table.

Something like
 
-- Create people table (one entry per person) 
CREATE TABLE people_dairy_map ( pdm_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, 
first_name VARCHAR(100), 
last_name VARCHAR(100), 
email VARCHAR(100) UNIQUE ); 
phone_number VARCHAR(15), 
person_id INT REFERENCES people(person_id)
dairy_id INT REFERENCES dairies(dairy_id);

I would be careful of ON DELETE CASCADE, just on principle :)

Obviously dairies table would no longer need the phone_number
I would possibly suggest putting the email_address in the PDM table, just in case you find a use case where a dairy has different email addresses depending on the owner.

For even more flexibility / future proofing, you could consider a 'type' column in the PDM table.  For example, type = 'O' would be owner, type = 'M' would be manager, and so on.   Now you have a full contacts representation that can be used for other purposes apart from denoting ownership details.

The above 3 tables represents what we used to call a simple BOM structure (Bill of Materials), and is used for example in manufacturing, where a car has many parts, a part can be used in many parts.  The same structure can also be used to represent lhe cases where a part is a sub-assembly of another part (assembly), and so on and so on, going many levels deep with the same basic 3 tables.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Willow Chargin
Date:
Subject: Functionally dependent columns in SELECT DISTINCT
Next
From: Thomas Ziegler
Date:
Subject: Failing to allocate memory when I think it shouldn't