Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josef Šimánek
Subject Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command
Date
Msg-id CAFp7QwpEFx2boCTSJd+u+mxxJ11zvjcRfEnYdpzBwyBtkLDMRQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
čt 7. 1. 2021 v 14:08 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> napsal:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 3:15 AM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/21 11:02 AM, Josef Šimánek wrote:
> > > I'm attaching the whole patch since commitfest failed to ingest the
> > > last incremental on CI.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, the whole patch needs to be attached for the commitfest tester to
> > work correctly - it can't apply pieces from multiple messages, etc.
> >
> > Anyway, I pushed this last version of patch, after a couple more tweaks,
> > mainly to the docs - one place used pg_stat_copy_progress, the section
> > was not indexed properly, and so on.
> >
>
> How about including a column for command similar to
> pg_stat_progress_create_index and pg_stat_progress_cluster? It seems
> that command will be useful in the context of COPY as there are many
> variants of COPY.
>

From pg_stat_progress_create_index docs:

The command that is running: CREATE INDEX, CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY,
REINDEX, or REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.

Which values should be present in copy progress? Just COPY FROM or COPY TO?

> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command
Next
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts