Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josef Šimánek
Subject Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command
Date
Msg-id CAFp7Qwo7smm0rH6JpCK3-qjKqS5yQN1X-Lg15PWFr8Rsonxdvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
pá 8. 1. 2021 v 5:03 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> napsal:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 8:42 AM Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > pá 8. 1. 2021 v 3:55 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> napsal:
> > >
> > >
> > > Can't we display the entire COPY command? I checked that
> > > pg_stat_statements display the query so there shouldn't be a problem
> > > to display the entire command.
> >
> > In previous discussions there was mentioned it doesn't make sense
> > since you can join with pg_stat_statements on the pid column if
> > needed. What would be the reason to duplicate that info?
> >
>
> But pg_stat_staments won't be present by default. Also, the same
> argument could be applied for the command to be present in
> stat_progress views. It occurred to me only when I was trying to
> compare what we display in all the progress views. I think there is
> some merit in being consistent.

Sorry, I mean pg_stat_activity (not pg_stat_statements). That is
included by default (at least in my installations).

> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simple progress reporting for COPY command
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts