I think the value is more important than the name, I want to the tests to make sure that the conversion is actually converting properly. With your method of getting the class name without the module we can have both.
The attached patch should print the value and the class name but not the module name.
Steve
Hi Steve,
I agree, we can check both. This is quite a nice patch now, I've reviewed it, all tests pass, works as expected. I think it is ready for committing.
