<div dir="ltr">On 28 May 2013 01:55, Peter Eisentraut <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net"
target="_blank">peter_e@gmx.net</a>></span>wrote:<br /><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote
class="gmail_quote"style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div
class="h5">OnMon, 2013-05-27 at 20:43 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:<br /> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Peter
Eisentraut<<a href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net">peter_e@gmx.net</a>> wrote:<br /> > > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at
16:46-0300, Claudio Freire wrote:<br /> > >> Well, it's easy.<br /> > >><br /> > >> Instead
ofPLyFloat_FromNumeric[0], you can make a<br /> > >> PLyDecimal_FromNumeric.<br /> > ><br /> > >
Pleasesend a patch. This would be a welcome addition.<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > I can write it blind as I have
morethan enough experience with<br /> > CPython, but I don't use PLPython so I can't perform extensive<br /> >
testing.<br/> > If someone's willing to do the testing, by all means.<br /><br /></div></div>Yes please.<br /><br
/></blockquote></div><br/></div><div class="gmail_extra" style="style">I'm working on that.</div><div
class="gmail_extra"style="style"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra" style="style">- Szymon</div></div>
