Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRfPeezggVRpwJLcCpL+CoyUMLZDhMTbSTq1KthmBN48WA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Here's set of patches rebased on the latest head.

This rebase mainly changes patch 0001, which translates partition
hierarchy into inheritance hierarchy creating AppendRelInfos and
RelOptInfos for partitioned partitions. Because of that, it's not
necessary to record the partitioned partitions in a
PartitionedChildRelInfos::child_rels. The only RTI that goes in there
is the RTI of child RTE which is same as the parent RTE except inh
flag. I tried removing that with a series of changes but it seems that
following code in ExecInitModifyTable() requires it.
1897     /* The root table RT index is at the head of the
partitioned_rels list */
1898     if (node->partitioned_rels)
1899     {
1900         Index       root_rti;
1901         Oid         root_oid;
1902
1903         root_rti = linitial_int(node->partitioned_rels);
1904         root_oid = getrelid(root_rti, estate->es_range_table);
1905         rel = heap_open(root_oid, NoLock);  /* locked by InitPlan */
1906     }
1907     else
1908         rel = mtstate->resultRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc;

I don't know whether we could change this code not to use
PartitionedChildRelInfos::child_rels. Removing
PartitionedChildRelInfos machinary seems like a separate patch.

The last two patches implement the advanced partition matching
algorithm and are here in this set for ready reference. Please use [1]
for discussing/reviewing those.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRdjQvaUEV5DJX3TW6pU5eq54NCkadtxHX2JiJG_GvbrCA@mail.gmail.com
-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rename RECOVERYXLOG to RECOVERYWAL?
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join