On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/15/17 23:45, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>>> +1. We should throw an error and add a line in documentation that
>>>> collation should not be specified for hash partitioned table.
>
>>> Why is it even allowed in the parser then?
>
>> That grammar is common to all the partitioning strategies. It looks
>> like it's easy to handle collation for hash partitions in
>> transformation than in grammar. But, if we could handle it in grammar,
>> I don't have any objection to it.
>
> If you disallow something in the grammar, the error message is unlikely to
> be better than "syntax error". That's not very desirable.
Right +1.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
