Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRem9PpMPXuJNrTTjike1gseRbSWUjJbx=5cD9Qi1egvoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Updated 0001 patch with some more comments. Attaching all the patches
for quick access.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2. If the PartitionJoinPath emerges as the best path, we create paths
>> for each of the remaining child-joins. Then we collect paths with
>> properties same as the given PartitionJoinPath, one from each
>> child-join. These paths are converted into plans and a Merge/Append
>> plan is created combing these plans. The paths and plans for
>> child-join are created in a temporary memory context. The final plan
>> for each child-join is copied into planner's context and the temporary
>> memory context is reset.
>>
>
> Robert and I discussed this in more detail. Path creation code may
> allocate objects other than paths. postgres_fdw, for example,
> allocates character array to hold the name of relation being
> pushed-down. When the temporary context gets zapped after creating
> paths for a given child-join, those other objects also gets thrown
> away. Attached patch has implemented the idea that came out of the
> discussion.
>
> We create a memory context for holding paths at the time of creating
> PlannerGlobal and save it in PlannerGlobal. The patch introduces a new
> macro makePathNode() which allocates the memory for given type of path
> from this context. Every create_*_path function has been changed to
> use this macro instead of makeNode(). In standard_planner(), at the
> end of planning we destroy the memory context freeing all the paths
> allocated. While creating a plan node, planner copies everything
> required by the plan from the path, so the path is not needed any
> more. So, freeing corresponding memory should not have any adverse
> effects.
>
> Most of the create_*_path() functions accept root as an argument, thus
> the temporary path context is available through root->glob everywhere.
> An exception is create_append_path() which does not accept root as an
> argument. The patch changes create_append_path() and its callers like
> set_dummy_rel_pathlist(), mark_dummy_rel() to accept root as an
> argument. Ideally paths are not required after creating plan, so we
> should be
> able to free the context right after the call to create_plan(). But we
> need dummy paths while creating flat rtable in
> set_plan_references()->add_rtes_to_flat_rtable(). We used to So free
> the path context at the end of planning cycle. Now that we are
> allocating all the paths in a different memory context, it doesn't
> make sense to switch context in mark_dummy_rel().
>
> 0001 patch implements the idea described above.
> 0002 patch adds instrumentation to measure memory consumed in
> standard_planner() call.
> 0003 patch adds a GUC zap_paths to enable/disable destroying path context.
> The last two patches are for testing only.
>
> Attached also find the SQL script and its output showing the memory
> saved. For a 5 way self-join of pg_class, the total memory consumed in
> standard_planner() is 760K without patch and with patch it comes down
> to 713K, saving 47K memory otherwise occupied by paths. It looks like
> something useful even without partition-wise joins.
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Postgres Database Company



-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] \h tab-completion
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SerializedSnapshotData alignment