Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRee0vF9mgiXGnO33zbZVgc5N67J0nY39zR0FWxfunVTvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it.  I
>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
>
> +1
>
> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql

To that I replied with
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com.
I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time.
Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and
Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in origin.c
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.