Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpReMzbHFhfnGRDOSK_FDftFbCNr3sgW_pt3EGzLDOyBoKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Jeevan Chalke
<jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

>
>
> Changes look good to me and refactoring will be useful for partitionwise
> patches.
>
> However, will it be good if we add agg_costs into the GroupPathExtraData
> too?
> Also can we pass this to the add_partial_paths_to_grouping_rel() and
> add_paths_to_grouping_rel() to avoid passing can_sort, can_hash and costs
> related details individually to them?

I think so too.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Comment on top of RangeVarGetRelidExtended in namespace.cmentioning RangeVarGetRelid