On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> natts represents the number of attributes, but for the hash partition bound we
>> are not dealing with the attribute so that I have used short-form of dimension,
>> thoughts?
>
> Okay, I think the dimension(dim) is also unfit here. Any suggestions?
>
I think natts is ok, since we are dealing with the number of
attributes in the pack of datums; esp. when ndatums is already taken.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
