On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2016/10/26 19:53, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>
>>> In practice, the search cost would be negligible compared to the cost of
>>> explaining/executing the query.
>>>
>>> My concern about your proposal is: it might not be worth complicating the
>>> code to solve a problem that is actually not a problem in practice.
>
>
>> To me the current code looks complicated esp. because of the recursion
>> involved and usage of out parameters to isSubqueryExpr().
>
>
> I don't think so. isSubqueryExpr is prety small, written in less than 50
> lines, and the code looks rather simple to me.
>
>> My
>> suggestion goes inline with the current method of deparsing a Var.
>
>
> Yeah, I think your approach makes it easy to search for the alias to a given
> Var from the array you proposed. I think the complexity of your approach
> would be in extra work for building and maintaining the array while
> deparsing the query. I think that would probably need more invasive and
> much larger changes to the existing code than what I proposed.
>
> I think this issue is optional, so I'd like to propose to leave this for the
> committer's judge.
>
Fine with me.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
