Re: Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRcRDcQu_J2H9=u1qrg=7pN9=eLRqp40jqGjsOpco7cJWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
It's allowed to specify an non-default opclass in partition by clause,
but I do not see any testcase testing the same. Can you please add
one.

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2016/10/07 17:33, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> I have applied latest patches, getting some error and crash, please check
>> if you are also able to reproduce the same.
>>
>> Observation1 : Not able to create index on partition table.
>> --------------
>> CREATE TABLE rp (c1 int, c2 int) PARTITION BY RANGE(c1);
>> CREATE TABLE rp_p1 PARTITION OF rp FOR VALUES START (1) END (10);
>> CREATE TABLE rp_p2 PARTITION OF rp FOR VALUES START (10) END (20);
>>
>> CREATE INDEX idx_rp_c1 on rp(c1);
>> ERROR:  cannot create index on partitioned table "rp"
>
> This one is a new behavior as I mentioned earlier in my previous email.
>
>> Observation2 : Getting cache lookup failed error for multiple column range
>> partition
>> --------------
>> CREATE TABLE rp1_m (c1 int, c2 int) PARTITION BY RANGE(c1, ((c1 + c2)/2));
>>
>> CREATE TABLE rp1_m_p1 PARTITION OF rp1_m FOR VALUES START (1, 1) END (10,
>> 10);
>> ERROR:  cache lookup failed for attribute 0 of relation 16429
>>
>> Observation3 : Getting server crash with multiple column range partition
>> --------------
>> CREATE TABLE rp2_m (c1 int, c2 int) PARTITION BY RANGE(((c2 + c1)/2), c2);
>> CREATE TABLE rp2_m_p1 PARTITION OF rp2_m FOR VALUES START (1, 1) END (10,
>> 10);
>> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>>     This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>>     before or while processing the request.
>> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
>> !>
>
> Fixed.  Should have been caught when running the regression tests after I
> made changes to 0001 to address some review comments (apparently there was
> no test in 0003 that would've caught this, so added a new one, thanks!).
>
>
> Attached updated patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit



-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers