Re: [GENERAL] Joining 16 tables seems slow - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Joining 16 tables seems slow
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDirLEjKjgEjv-0iCqxyJwtjOX8CCEaWaiyOR4S8BSx3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Joining 16 tables seems slow  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general


2017-09-12 14:01 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
"Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> writes:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2017-09-12 8:45 GMT+02:00 Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com>:
>>>   I am experimenting with optimising a SQL statement. One version uses 4 LEFT JOIN’s and a 5-way CASE statement in the body. The second moves the filtering into the JOIN section, and I end up with 16 LEFT JOIN’s and no CASE statements.

>> you can experimentally try increase FROM_COLLAPSE_LIMIT to some higher number 14 maybe 16

> I tried increasing FROM_COLLAPSE_LIMIT, but it made no difference.

For this you need to increase join_collapse_limit, not
from_collapse_limit.  (Usually, though, there's little reason not to keep
them the same.)

sure - my mistake - I though it.

Thank you

Pavel 

                        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Joining 16 tables seems slow
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] WAL & ready files retained after turning off logshipping