Re: psql JSON output format - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: psql JSON output format
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDecv1bURtWj67k1DLCy6O9Efw4BdakotXAqtw37DjMPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql JSON output format  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


pá 17. 5. 2024 v 16:04 odesílatel Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> napsal:
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:42 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> Thanks for summarizing the thread.
>
> Things mentioned in the thread:
>
> 1) rendering of SQL NULLs - include or omit the column
>
> 2) rendering of JSON values - both "quoted string" and "inline as
>    JSON" make sense
>
> 3) not quoting numeric values and booleans
>
> 4) no special treatment of other datatypes like arrays or compound
>    values, just quote them
>
> 5) row format: JSON object or array (array would be close to CSV
>    format)
>
> 6) overall format: array of rows, or simply print each row separately
>    ("JSON Lines" format, https://jsonlines.org/)
>
> I think 1, 2 and perhaps 6 make sense to have configurable. Two or
> three \pset options (or one option with a list of flags) don't sound
> too bad complexity-wise.
>
> Or maybe just default to "omit NULL columns" and "inline JSON" (and
> render null as NULL).

If we're going to just have one option, I agree with making that the
default, and I'd default to an array of row objects. If we're going to
have something configurable, I'd at least consider making (4)
configurable.

It's tempting to just have one option, like \pset jsonformat
nullcolumns=omit;inlinevalues=json,array;rowformat=object;resultcontainer=array
simply because adding a ton of new options just for this isn't very
appealing. But looking at how long that is, it's probably not a great
idea. So I guess separate options is probably better?

+1 for separate options

lot of these proposed options can be used for XML too

Regards

Pavel


--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose