2014/1/22 Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
> On 1/22/14, 3:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> writes:
>>
>>> SELECT * INTO f1, f2 FROM lotsofcolumns;
>>>
>>
>> I can't say I think this is a good idea, but not sure breaking this case
>>> is worth it either.
>>>
>>
>> Um, I thought the whole point was to complain about that. If this isn't a
>> mistake, how can you consistently maintain the other one is?
>>
>
> I'm sure you can see a difference between explicitly listing the wrong
> number of columns and using * to ignore trailing columns. That said, this
> *should* be an error according to the documentation, so it's probably not
> the end of the world if we break it.
>
>
> In bug #8893 there was some discussion which I interpreted to mean that
>>> we could improve this a bit by checking the number of returned columns
>>> during compile time if there's no * in the target list. Attached is a
>>> crude patch attempting to do that, which appears to be working. Any
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> Ick. I thought you wanted to do this at first execution, anyway, not in
>> pl_gram.y.
>>
>
> Catching these errors at compile time would be ideal. If we also want to
> catch the * cases we could also check the result structure before the first
> execution.
>
It is exactly it what is done by plpgsql_check_function - without
introduction new dependencies and without possible performance impacts.
Regards
Pavel
>
>
> Regards,
> Marko Tiikkaja
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
>
