On 09/18/2014 01:29 PM, Vik Fearing wrote: > On 09/18/2014 10:16 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >>> WITH >>> FUNCTION f1(a int) RETURNS int AS $$ .. $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql, >>> FUNCTION f2(a int) RETURNS SETOF int AS $$ .. $$ LANGUAGE >>> plpgsql, >>> SELECT f1(x) FROM f2(z) LATERAL .... >>> >>> We can generalize WITH clause, so there SEQENCES, VIEWS, .. can be >>> defined for "single usage" >> +2 >> >> I just proposed the same thing in another branch of this discussion >> before reading this :) >> >> I guess it proves (a little) that WITH is the right place to do these >> kind of things ... > > I've been wanting this syntax for a few years now, so I certainly vote > for it. >
Just to clarify: I want the WITH syntax for different purposes. However, I *also* want DO $$ ... $$ USING ( ). Those are two separate, different features with different use-cases.
