Re: Improving the performance of psql tab completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Improving the performance of psql tab completion
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDTZMH0r4c6cNGXD_LGsPBUwa0GgoxMJ+YcRMQOqLm4gQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving the performance of psql tab completion  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2012/10/10 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>>> ...but isn't pg_table_is_visible overkill for tab completion?
>>
>> How much does this help?
>>
>> update pg_proc set procost = 10 where proname = 'pg_table_is_visible';
>
> hm, it fixes the problem.  Also, at least for 9.2, the procost is
> still set at one (just looked).  Well, thanks!

can we increase this value in 9.3. I though so default 10 is from 9.0,
but it is 1 still.

Regards

Pavel

>
> merlin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ?
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ?