Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDC+m-7To5uzk_0NQKp8O-y75XLKXnEg4spuDduTsj6Eg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers



2013/8/20 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
On 2013-08-20 14:15:55 +0200, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>     david=# DO $$
> >>     david$# BEGIN
> >>     david$#     WITH now AS (SELECT now())
> >>     david$#     PERFORM * from now;
> >>     david$# END;
> >>     david$# $$;
> >>     ERROR:  syntax error at or near "PERFORM"
> >>     LINE 4:     PERFORM * from now;
> >>                 ^
> >> Parser bug in PL/pgSQL, perhaps?
> >
> > no
> >
> > you cannot use a PL/pgSQL statement inside SQL statement.
>
> Well, there ought to be *some* way to tell PL/pgSQL to discard the result. Right now I am adding a variable to select into but never otherwise use. Inelegant, IMHO. Perhaps I’m missing some other way to do it?
>
> If so, it would help if the hint suggesting the use of PERFORM pointed to such alternatives.

Not that that's elegant but IIRC PERFORM (WITH ...) ought to work. I
don't think the intermingled plpgsql/sql grammars allow a nice way right
now.

+1

Pavel

 

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE