> Putting this and all future options as keywords seems like a poor > choice. Indeed, the # syntax proposed isn't even fully described on > list here, nor are examples given in tests. My feeling is that nobody > even knows that is being proposed and would likely cause more > discussion if they did. So I wish to push back the # syntax to a later > release when it has had more discussion. It would be good if you could > lead that discussion in later releases.
I am returning back to #option syntax
a) it should not be plpgsql keywords
b) it can be nice if validity can be verified by plpgsql plugins and used by plpgsql plugins much more. Now we can use only GUC for plugin parametrization, but it is not readable as #option it is.
