Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCxVuqD+04BPyjn22k5H-fQDDyUNV0hWUtKoDnWrr2L_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


2016-09-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> I feel like we're getting wrapped around the axle as it regards who is
>> perceived to be voting for what.

> Thanks Stephen Frost for listing down all the concerns from the people
> on the different approaches.

I'm not sure if we've arrived at a consensus or not, but here's my
current thinking: it's very early in the v10 cycle, so we have time
to experiment.  I propose to push my current patch (ie, move PL function
source code to \df+ footers), and we can use it in HEAD for awhile
and see what we think.  We can alway improve or revert it later.

I had some objection to format of source code - it should be full source code, not just header and body.

Regards

Pavel

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Next
From: Lou Picciano
Date:
Subject: Re: Python3.4 detection on 9.6 configuration