Re: Performance tunning - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Performance tunning
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCxBYFe=wzgt6YXCOc67dYo4Rr1BGWnLLp6sTQKw5Xv=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Performance tunning  (sugnathi hai <suganhai@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Performance tunning
List pgsql-performance
Hi

so 30. 5. 2020 v 9:37 odesílatel sugnathi hai <suganhai@yahoo.com> napsal:
Hi ,

Can you help to tune the below plan

Limit (cost=0.87..336777.92 rows=100 width=57) (actual time=599302.173..599481.552 rows=100 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=78496066 -> Nested Loop (cost=0.87..11005874.67 rows=3268 width=57) (actual time=599302.170..599481.506 rows=100 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=78496066 -> Index Scan using inx_callprocessingstatus_modifieddate on callprocessingstatus contactsta1_ (cost=0.44..2008486.89 rows=15673696 width=16) (actual time=0.356..66774.105 rows=15651059 loops=1) Index Cond: (modifieddate < now()) Filter: ((overallstatus)::text = 'COMPLETED'::text) Rows Removed by Filter: 275880 Buffers: shared hit=15803632 -> Index Scan using "INX_callinfo_Callid" on callinfo contact0_ (cost=0.43..0.57 rows=1 width=49) (actual time=0.033..0.033 rows=0 loops=15651059) Index Cond: (callid = contactsta1_.callid) Filter: ((combinationkey IS NULL) AND (mod(callid, '2'::bigint) = 0)) Rows Removed by Filter: 1 Buffers: shared hit=62692434 Planning Time: 1.039 ms Execution Time: 599481.758 ms

Can you show a query related to this plan?




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: sugnathi hai
Date:
Subject: Performance tunning
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance tunning