Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRC_ZUixbsoaJpGTuaDZO_Tx-hq8OwPS7DvBSSGePBGwdQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr">Hi<p dir="ltr">> index 2e7f1d7..d983a50 100644<br /> > --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c<br
/>> +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c<br /> > @@ -4933,6 +4933,11 @@ sigusr1_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS)<br />
>        if (XLogArchivingAlways())<br /> >             PgArchPID = pgarch_start();<br /> ><br /> > +#ifdef
USE_SYSTEMD<br/> > +       if (!EnableHotStandby)<br /> > +           sd_notify(0, "READY=1");<br /> >
+#endif<br/> > +<br /> >         pmState = PM_RECOVERY;<br /> >     }<br /> >     if
(CheckPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_BEGIN_HOT_STANDBY)&&<br /> ><p dir="ltr">I cannot to check it this week, but
thisshould to work. "ready" state for standby only mode starting when slave is able to get wal records or segments from
server.I will test it next week.<p dir="ltr">regards<p dir="ltr">Pavel<br /><p dir="ltr">> > Default timeout on
FCis 90 sec - it is should not to be enough for<br /> > > large servers with large shared buffers and high
checkpointsegments. It<br /> > > should be mentioned in service file.<br /> ><br /> > Good point.  I think
weshould set TimeoutSec=0 in the suggested service file.<br /> ><br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Fix KNN GiST ordering type