Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCA6VA1MVUjiGY=othFKAqFRm-LM3NrapFicsQhsuN5pA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Responses Re: SQL-standard function body
List pgsql-hackers


st 1. 7. 2020 v 22:31 odesílatel Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> napsal:
On 7/1/20 9:32 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> st 1. 7. 2020 v 20:19 odesílatel Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
> napsal:
>
>> On 7/1/20 3:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I actually don't have a very clear idea of what the standard has to
>>> say about SQL-language functions. Does it just say it's a list of
>>> statements, or does it involve variables and control-flow constructs
>>> and stuff like that, too?
>>
>>
>> It's either a single sql statement, or a collection of them between
>> "begin atomic" and "end".  There are no variables or flow control
>> constructs or anything like that, just as there are no such things
>> outside of a function.
>>
>
> What is the source of this comment?


The SQL Standard.

The SQL Standard is really big, and is very possible so I miss this part. Can you send me a link?

Regards

Pavel



> Maybe we are speaking (and thinking)
> about different languages.


I think so, yes.


> I thought the language of SQL functions (ANSI/SQL) is SQL/PSM.


That is something else entirely, and not at all what Peter's patch is about.
--
Vik Fearing

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode