Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBy8Jjbt+GAk279qcwQ7D_YHjZOFLpVY8TxOoXdu2-=XQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2013/6/24 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
> Hello
>
> you can try fresh patch
>
> git format-patch -1 788bce13d3249ddbcdf3443ee078145f4888ab45

and git format-patch -1 bc61878682051678ade5f59da7bfd90ab72ce13b

>
> regards
>
> Pavel
>
> 2013/6/24 Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>:
>> On 14 March 2013 03:45, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 08:35 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> > in this use case I am think so some regression test is important - It
>>> > should not be mine, but missing more explicit regression test is
>>> > reason, why this bug was not detected some years.
>>>
>>> I've added the tests.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> how should I apply the patch from fix-xmlmap.patch? I've run out of ideas.
>>
>> When I run it normally, I get:
>>
>> $ patch --verbose --dry-run -p1 < fix-xmlmap.patch
>> Hmm...(Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without
>> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
>> the new style...)
>>   Looks like a context diff to me...
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |*** a/src/backend/utils/adt/xml.c
>> |--- b/src/backend/utils/adt/xml.c
>> --------------------------
>> Patching file src/backend/utils/adt/xml.c using Plan A...
>> (Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without
>> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
>> the new style...)
>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 2002 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
>> Hmm...(Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without
>> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
>> the new style...)
>>   The next patch looks like a context diff to me...
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |*** a/src/test/regress/expected/xmlmap.out
>> |--- b/src/test/regress/expected/xmlmap.out
>> --------------------------
>> Patching file src/test/regress/expected/xmlmap.out using Plan A...
>> (Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without
>> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
>> the new style...)
>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1201 (offset 27 lines).
>> Hmm...(Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without
>> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
>> the new style...)
>>   The next patch looks like a context diff to me...
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |*** a/src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql
>> |--- b/src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql
>> --------------------------
>> Patching file src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql using Plan A...
>> (Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without
>> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
>> the new style...)
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 39.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql.rej
>> done
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Szymon



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: dump difference between 9.3 and master after upgrade