Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Subject | Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBy8Jjbt+GAk279qcwQ7D_YHjZOFLpVY8TxOoXdu2-=XQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
2013/6/24 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>: > Hello > > you can try fresh patch > > git format-patch -1 788bce13d3249ddbcdf3443ee078145f4888ab45 and git format-patch -1 bc61878682051678ade5f59da7bfd90ab72ce13b > > regards > > Pavel > > 2013/6/24 Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>: >> On 14 March 2013 03:45, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 08:35 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>> > in this use case I am think so some regression test is important - It >>> > should not be mine, but missing more explicit regression test is >>> > reason, why this bug was not detected some years. >>> >>> I've added the tests. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >>> To make changes to your subscription: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >> >> >> >> Hi, >> how should I apply the patch from fix-xmlmap.patch? I've run out of ideas. >> >> When I run it normally, I get: >> >> $ patch --verbose --dry-run -p1 < fix-xmlmap.patch >> Hmm...(Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without >> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate >> the new style...) >> Looks like a context diff to me... >> The text leading up to this was: >> -------------------------- >> |*** a/src/backend/utils/adt/xml.c >> |--- b/src/backend/utils/adt/xml.c >> -------------------------- >> Patching file src/backend/utils/adt/xml.c using Plan A... >> (Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without >> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate >> the new style...) >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 2002 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line). >> Hmm...(Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without >> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate >> the new style...) >> The next patch looks like a context diff to me... >> The text leading up to this was: >> -------------------------- >> |*** a/src/test/regress/expected/xmlmap.out >> |--- b/src/test/regress/expected/xmlmap.out >> -------------------------- >> Patching file src/test/regress/expected/xmlmap.out using Plan A... >> (Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without >> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate >> the new style...) >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1201 (offset 27 lines). >> Hmm...(Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without >> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate >> the new style...) >> The next patch looks like a context diff to me... >> The text leading up to this was: >> -------------------------- >> |*** a/src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql >> |--- b/src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql >> -------------------------- >> Patching file src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql using Plan A... >> (Fascinating -- this is really a new-style context diff but without >> the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate >> the new style...) >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 39. >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >> src/test/regress/sql/xmlmap.sql.rej >> done >> >> >> thanks, >> Szymon
pgsql-hackers by date: