Re: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBxPvH9LxUOHRzvTkuOnX1dVJkF=VJyxaFQPbK5L3YhuA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
List pgsql-hackers
2013/1/4 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>> What is state of this issue?
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00423.php
>
> AFAICS we never identified the cause.  It was pretty clear that
> something was failing to clean up shared-memory lock data structures,
> but not what that something was.  The last productive suggestion was
> to add process-exit-time logging of whether unreleased locks remain,
> but if Dave ever did that, he didn't report back what he found.


probably I am able to find statement, that was canceled as last
"success" statement from our application logs. And probably it will be
LOCK ... or CREATE TABLE AS SELECT

Recheck on session end can help us to drop this leaked locks, but I
don't understand how it can help with finding with finding the cause?




>
> Maybe you could add such logging on your machines.
>
>                         regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields