Re: enhanced error fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: enhanced error fields
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBuu1wvCowGYEtA3pjF6f9s3R1oDDdASRB_vDM8BBOFDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: enhanced error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: enhanced error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Peter

here is updated patch, sorry for missing file

Regards

Pavel

2012/10/8 Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 20 August 2012 14:09, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (eelog-2012-08-20.diff)
>
> This patch has the following reference to relerror.c:
>
> """""""
>
> *** a/src/include/utils/rel.h
> --- b/src/include/utils/rel.h
> ***************
> *** 394,397 **** typedef struct StdRdOptions
> --- 394,402 ----
>   extern void RelationIncrementReferenceCount(Relation rel);
>   extern void RelationDecrementReferenceCount(Relation rel);
>
> + /* routines in utils/error/relerror.c */
>
> """""""
>
> Indeed, the new C file has been separately added to a makefile:
>
> ! OBJS = assert.o elog.o relerror.o
>
> However, the new file itself does not appear in this patch. Therefore,
> the code does not compile. Please post a revision with the new file
> included.
>
> --
> Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving the performance of psql tab completion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ?