Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBpTN92oOqm2vdJ40A0pwO0qRCPPVAuAnqEXy1HeOfHhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


2016-08-24 15:42 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 8/22/16 1:52 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> If I understand to purpose of this patch - it is compromise - PL source
>> is removed from table, but it is printed in result.

> What does it do if you are displaying more than one function?

It prints more than one footer.  It's very much like the way that, say,
rules are printed for tables by \d.


Using footer for this purpose is little bit strange. What about following design?

1. move out source code of PL functions from \df+
2. allow not unique filter in \sf and allow to display multiple functions

Regards

Pavel

 
 
                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog