> > >2015-07-28 5:24 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>: > > 2015-07-27 21:57 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>: > > On 07/27/2015 02:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I am trying to run parallel execution > > psql -At -c "select datname from pg_database" postgres | xargs -n 1 -P 3 psql -c "select current_database()" > > > > I don't think it's going to be a hugely important feature, but I don't see a problem with creating a new option (-C seems fine) which would have the same effect as if the arguments were contatenated into a file which is then used with -f. IIRC -c has some special characteristics which means it's probably best not to try to extend it for this feature. > > > ok, I'll try to write patch. > > >I have a question. Can be -C option multiple?
hello, Have you thought of how to support -1 along with -C ?
> handle the input as with -f that is, -1 -C would be equivalent to -c
and psql -1 -C "sql_1; sql_2;" -C "sql_3; sql_4;"
=> ?
BEGIN; sql_1; sql_2; END;
BEGIN; sql_3; sql_4; END;
thoughts ?
"-1" option is global -, I expected so following steps are more natural
BEGIN
sql_1;
sql_2;
sql_3;
sql_4;
END;
Regards
pavel
The same logic could be added to -f although I see less advantages as with adding -C
