broken reading on standby (PostgreSQL 16.2) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Subject | broken reading on standby (PostgreSQL 16.2) |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBEFMxxFSCVOSi-4n0jHzSaxh6Ze_cZid5eG=tsnn49-A@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: broken reading on standby (PostgreSQL 16.2)
Re: broken reading on standby (PostgreSQL 16.2) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
yesterday, I had to fix strange issue on standby server
The query to freshly updated data fails
select * from seller_success_rate where create_time::date = '2024-04-23';
ERROR: 58P01: could not access status of transaction 1393466389
DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_xact/0530": No such file or directory.
LOCATION: SlruReportIOError, slru.c:947
ERROR: 58P01: could not access status of transaction 1393466389
DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_xact/0530": No such file or directory.
LOCATION: SlruReportIOError, slru.c:947
amcheck
select * from verify_heapam('seller_success_rate');
blkno | offnum | attnum | msg
-------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
5763 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5863 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5863 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5868 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5868 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5875 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5895 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5895 | 110 | | xmin 1439564642 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 108 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 110 | | xmin 1439564642 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 112 | | xmin 1424677216 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6378 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6378 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6382 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6590 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6590 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
7578 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
7581 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
8390 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
10598 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
10598 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
blkno | offnum | attnum | msg
-------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
5763 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5863 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5863 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5868 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5868 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5875 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5895 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
5895 | 110 | | xmin 1439564642 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 108 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 110 | | xmin 1439564642 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6245 | 112 | | xmin 1424677216 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6378 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6378 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6382 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6590 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
6590 | 111 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
7578 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
7581 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
8390 | 112 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
10598 | 109 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
10598 | 110 | | xmin 1393466389 precedes oldest valid transaction ID 3:1523885078
I verified xmin against the primary server, and it was the same. There was not any replication gap.
I checked the fields from pg_database table, and looks same too
These rows were valid (and visible) on primary.
On this server there was not any long session (when I was connected), unfortunately I cannot test restart of this server. One wal sender is executing on standby. Fortunately, there was a possibility to run VACUUM FULL, and it fixed the issue.
The customer has archived wals.
My question - is it possible to do some diagnostics from SQL level? I didn't find a way to get values that are used for comparison by amcheck from SQL.
Regards
Pavel
pgsql-hackers by date: