Le 07/02/2025 à 23:00, Pavel Stehule a écrit : > Hi > > I rewrote this patch. Instead of enhancing the main SQL parser, it > does post parser checks of the parse tree. > > Now the patch is significantly less invasive (changes are just in > plpgsql - mostly in grammar), and it is smaller (without regress tests > it has half size). > > This patch allows the detection of usage of undocumented syntax for > plpgsql expressions. Using this undocumented > syntax can be the reason why badly written code (missing semicolon) > can be quietly executed without any raising of error. > > Only patch 01 is important - patches 02, 03 are prepared for review. > Patch 02 activates a new check by default, and fixes the regress test > to be executed. This is important for checking for possible false alarms. > Patch 03 disables this check and returns regress tests to their > original state. > > Regards > > Pavel
Hi Pavel,
I'm reviewing this patch too and I'm facing some documentation issues in patch v20250207-0001-use-strict-rules-for-parsing-PL-pgSQL-expressions.patch
+ it doesn't to allow to detect broken code.
I'm not very good at english but I think it should be: it doesn't allow to detect broken code.
fixed
Here I think the sentence is not complete: + This check is allowed only <varname>plpgsql.extra_errors</varname>.
Do you mean: This check is allowed only when <varname>plpgsql.extra_errors</varname> is set to 'strict_expr_check'.
Please fix these to be sure of what the code is supposed to do.