Re: F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE equivalent in Postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE equivalent in Postgresql
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRB+LGLenjHYo2WbCDsEnQt5m7BSzDC7O-CUQSfUTgjsbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE equivalent in Postgresql  (msi77 <msi77@yandex.ru>)
List pgsql-sql
Hello

this is not built in MSSQL, but PostgreSQL has a "generate_series" function

Regards

Pavel Stehule

2011/8/16 msi77 <msi77@yandex.ru>:
>
> Are you sure that dbo.F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE is in SQL Server?
> I suppose that this is UDF written by user.
>
>
> 16.08.2011, 08:53, "Yuan HOng" <hongyuan1306@gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With MS-SQL sever, there is a built-in utility function
>> dbo.F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE which generates a list of number between the
>> given range. For example:
>>
>> select dbo.F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE(1, 5) will return:
>>
>> number
>> -----------
>> 1
>> 2
>> 3
>> 4
>> 5
>>
>> This is extremely convenient for generating consecutive dates. For
>> example, I want to find out the daily sales information and if on some
>> day there is no sales, the query should return 0 instead of a missing
>> date.
>>
>> In this case it is necessary to first create a list of consecutive
>> dates and then left join to some fact table.
>>
>> With the range function I can simply write something like
>>
>> select start_date + interval number
>> from dbo.F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE(1, number_of_days)
>>
>> How does one accomplish such task with Postgresql?
>>
>> --
>> Hong Yuan
>>
>> 大管家网上建材超市
>> 装修装潢建材一站式购物
>> http://www.homemaster.cn
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
>


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: msi77
Date:
Subject: Re: F_TABLE_NUMBER_RANGE equivalent in Postgresql
Next
From: adam_pgsql
Date:
Subject: which is better: using OR clauses or UNION?